OWC (OWC8566DDR3S8GP)
OWC
32 Overall Score
vs
Timetec Pinnacle Konduit 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 White
Timetec
69 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
OWC (OWC8566DDR3S8GP)
No customer feedback yet
Timetec Pinnacle Konduit 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 White
88 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews
This RAM kit is praised for its performance, stability, and value. Users report it works flawlessly at advertised speeds and even overclocks well, making it a great budget-friendly choice for builds. The only minor issue is a lack of detailed information, such as weight, in the Q&A.
Pros
- Works at advertised speeds
- Stable under load
- Good value for money
- Overclocks well
- Aesthetic design
Cons
- Lack of detailed specs in Q&A
Performance 5
Stability 4
Value for money 4
Overclocking 2
Build quality 2
Compatibility 3
Scores
Budget
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Server
Specifications
| OWC | Timetec Pinnacle Konduit | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR3 | DDR4★ |
| Form Factor | SODIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 260 | 288 |
| Rank | — | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 7★ | 16 |
| Timings | — | 16-18-18-38 |
| Voltage | 1.5 | 1.350000023841858★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
OWC (OWC8566DDR3S8GP)
- Strong affordability (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong latency (70th percentile)
- Below average speed (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
Timetec Pinnacle Konduit 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 White
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (78th percentile)
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
Pricing
Verdict
Winner: Timetec Pinnacle Konduit
Scores 69 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 16 specs.
