MIRO C69M Pro Black 256GB
MIRO
36 Overall Score
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Frost Blue 256GB
Xiaomi
68 Overall Score
Scores
Battery Life
Budget
Photography
Foldable
Gaming
Flagship
Compact
Business
Rugged
Specifications
| MIRO C69M Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Display Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED★ |
| Resolution | 1640 x 720 | — |
| Refresh Rate | — | 120 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 3000 nits★ |
| HDR | — | ✓★ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Octa-core | — |
| Processor Model | Octa-core | Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 |
| CPU Cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU Speed | — | 2.50★ |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Expandable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 200 MP★ |
| Camera Count | 1 | 3★ |
| Ultrawide | — | 8 MP★ |
| Telephoto | — | 2 MP★ |
| Front Camera | 16 MP | 20 MP★ |
| Optical Zoom | — | 2x, 4x★ |
| Video | — | 4K@30fps★ |
| OIS | — | ✓★ |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 5,160 mAh★ | 5,110 mAh |
| Wired Charging | — | 120W★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✗ |
| Fast Charging | — | HyperCharge |
| Connector | USB-C | USB-C |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E★ |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4★ |
| NFC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB-C★ |
| SIM | Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| Design & Build | ||
| Form Factor | bar | bar |
| Weight | 0.19 kg | 0.19 kg |
| Fingerprint | — | in-display |
| Face Recognition | — | ✓★ |
| OS | Android | Android |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | — |
| Stereo Speakers | — | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
MIRO C69M Pro Black 256GB
- Strong battery (66th percentile)
- Below average camera (31st percentile)
- Below average social proof (32nd percentile)
- Below average display (34th percentile)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Frost Blue 256GB
- Strong display (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong battery (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong camera (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong connectivity (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average feature (26th percentile)
Verdict
Winner: Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Scores 68 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 19 of 39 specs.