Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Fold8 Cream 256GB
Samsung
63 Overall Score
vs
Xiaomi 14 Ultra White 512GB
Xiaomi
77 Overall Score
Scores
Gaming
Flagship
Battery Life
Photography
Foldable
Budget
Rugged
Business
Compact
Specifications
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Fold8 | Xiaomi 14 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Display Type | Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED★ |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Brightness | — | 3000 nits★ |
| HDR | — | ✓★ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor Model | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| CPU Cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU Speed | 4.74★ | 3.30 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB★ |
| Storage | 256 GB | 512 GB★ |
| Storage Type | — | UFS 4.0★ |
| Expandable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Camera Count | 2 | 4★ |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP★ |
| Front Camera | 10 MP | 32 MP★ |
| Optical Zoom | — | 5x★ |
| Video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| OIS | — | ✓★ |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh★ |
| Wired Charging | — | 90W★ |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fast Charging | — | PD 3.0, QC4 |
| Connector | USB-C | USB-C |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 7★ |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4★ |
| NFC | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 3.2★ |
| SIM | Nano SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM |
| eSIM | ✓★ | — |
| Design & Build | ||
| Water Resistance | IP48 | IP68★ |
| Form Factor | foldable | bar |
| Weight | 0.20 kg★ | — |
| Fingerprint | — | in-display |
| Face Recognition | ✓★ | — |
| OS | Android | Android |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✗ |
| Stereo Speakers | — | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Fold8 Cream 256GB
- Strong performance (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong feature (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
- Strong display (69th percentile)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra White 512GB
- Strong display (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong camera (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
Verdict
Winner: Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Scores 77 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 18 of 40 specs.