ASUS TUF VG289Q1A 28" 2024

ASUS TUF VG289Q1A 28" 2024

ASUS
47 Overall Score
vs
MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32" Black 2024

MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32" Black 2024

MSI
91 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
ASUS
51
MSI
92
Office
ASUS
34
MSI
89
Entertainment
ASUS
51
MSI
86
Professional
ASUS
55
MSI
74
Creative
ASUS
62
MSI
74
Portable
ASUS
6
MSI
14

Specifications

ASUS TUF VG289Q1A 28"MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32"
Display
Size28"32"
Resolution3840 x 21603840 x 2160
Panel TypeIPSOLED
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved
Curvature1,700
Performance
Refresh Rate60 Hz240 Hz
Response Time5 ms0.029999999329447746 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync PremiumG-Sync Compatible
Color & HDR
Brightness350 nits1000 nits
Color GamutDCI-P3 grade99% DCI-P3
Color Depth10-bit (8-bit + FRC)10-bit
HDRHDR10DisplayHDR True Black 400
HDR SupportHDR400
Connectivity
HDMI Ports12
DisplayPort11
USB-C1
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Weight15.42 kg9.60 kg

Pros & Cons

ASUS TUF VG289Q1A 28" 2024

  • Strong color (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong display (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong feature (72nd percentile)
  • Below average ergonomic (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average social proof (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average portability (24th percentile)

MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32" Black 2024

  • Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile

Verdict

Winner: MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32"

Scores 91 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 28 specs.

MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32" Better at:

GamingOfficeCreativePortableProfessionalEntertainment