Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Tamron
100 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox FV-Viltrox AF 16mm f/1.8 FE

Viltrox FV-Viltrox AF 16mm f/1.8 FE

Viltrox
66 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Viltrox FV-Viltrox AF 16mm f/1.8 FE

85 out of 100 medium confidence 23 reviews

The Sony 16mm f/1.8 G lens is widely praised for its compact size, sharpness, and excellent low-light performance, making it a favorite for astrophotography and wide-angle work. Users appreciate the fast and reliable autofocus, lightweight build, and the ability to use standard 67mm filters. A few criticisms include noticeable vignetting at the corners and the lack of an included lens case at this price point.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast f/1.8 aperture for low light
  • Fast and reliable autofocus
  • Standard 67mm filter thread
Cons
  • Noticeable corner vignetting
  • No lens case included
  • Expensive for some buyers
  • Too wide for some subjects
👍 Image quality 12
👍 Build quality 6
👍 Size and weight 10
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👍 Low light performance 6
🤔 Value for money 5

Scores

Macro
Tamron
91
Viltrox
64
Budget
Tamron
91
Viltrox
59
Landscape
Tamron
90
Viltrox
63
Portrait
Tamron
87
Viltrox
54
Professional
Tamron
85
Viltrox
73
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
84
Viltrox
64
Travel
Tamron
84
Viltrox
59
Street
Tamron
82
Viltrox
65
Video Cinema
Tamron
80
Viltrox
63

Specifications

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mmViltrox FV-Viltrox AF 16mm f/1.8 FE
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm16 mm
Elements2015
Groups1312
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements24★
Coatingfluorine coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperture4-7.1f/1.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades911★
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.59 kg0.30 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeVXD linear motorXD linear motors
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm150 mm★
Max Magnification1:2.8★0.25x

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Viltrox FV-Viltrox AF 16mm f/1.8 FE

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Pricing

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Viltrox FV-Viltrox AF 16mm f/1.8 FE

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider