Rokinon AS UMC IO35AF-E 35mm

Rokinon AS UMC IO35AF-E 35mm

Rokinon
36 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Tamron
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Rokinon AS UMC IO35AF-E 35mm

72 out of 100 high confidence 34 reviews

The Rokinon 35mm lenses receive generally positive feedback for their sharpness, compact size, and value for money, especially for travel and street photography. However, some users report issues with autofocus noise and hunting, particularly in video mode, and a few note build quality concerns. The f/1.4 version is praised for astrophotography but criticized for weight and softness wide open. Overall, it's a solid budget-friendly option with trade-offs in performance.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Great value for money
  • Good for travel and street photography
  • Fast aperture (f/1.4) for low light
Cons
  • Noisy autofocus motor
  • Autofocus hunts in video mode
  • Build quality feels cheap
  • Heavy for f/1.4 version
  • Soft wide open at f/1.4
👍 Image quality 12
🤔 Build quality 8
👎 Autofocus performance 7
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Size and weight 10
👎 Video use 4

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Scores

Macro
Rokinon
38
Tamron
91
Budget
Rokinon
37
Tamron
91
Landscape
Rokinon
47
Tamron
90
Portrait
Rokinon
30
Tamron
87
Professional
Rokinon
36
Tamron
84
Wildlife Sports
Rokinon
30
Tamron
84
Travel
Rokinon
45
Tamron
84
Street
Rokinon
43
Tamron
82
Video Cinema
Rokinon
32
Tamron
80

Specifications

Rokinon AS UMC IO35AF-E 35mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm300 mm
Elements1220
Groups1013
Aspherical Elements13★
ED Elements—2★
CoatingUMC Coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-7.1
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades69★
Build
MountCanon EFSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.09 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification0.12x1:2.8★

Pros & Cons

Rokinon AS UMC IO35AF-E 35mm

  • Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (65th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Pricing

Rokinon AS UMC IO35AF-E 35mm

No current pricing available

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider