Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm

Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm

Rokinon
40 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm

72 out of 100 high confidence 34 reviews

The Rokinon 35mm lenses receive generally positive feedback for their sharpness, compact size, and value for money, especially for travel and street photography. However, some users report issues with autofocus noise and hunting, particularly in video mode, and a few note build quality concerns. The f/1.4 version is praised for astrophotography but criticized for weight and softness wide open. Overall, it's a solid budget-friendly option with trade-offs in performance.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Great value for money
  • Good for travel and street photography
  • Fast aperture (f/1.4) for low light
Cons
  • Noisy autofocus motor
  • Autofocus hunts in video mode
  • Build quality feels cheap
  • Heavy for f/1.4 version
  • Soft wide open at f/1.4
👍 Image quality 12
🤔 Build quality 8
👎 Autofocus performance 7
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Size and weight 10
👎 Video use 4

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Scores

Budget
Rokinon
46
Tamron
97
Macro
Rokinon
36
Tamron
92
Landscape
Rokinon
42
Tamron
87
Wildlife Sports
Rokinon
38
Tamron
85
Professional
Rokinon
37
Tamron
85
Street
Rokinon
49
Tamron
83
Portrait
Rokinon
30
Tamron
82
Video Cinema
Rokinon
36
Tamron
82
Travel
Rokinon
45
Tamron
81

Specifications

Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm300 mm
Elements720
Groups613
Aspherical Elements13★
ED Elements—2★
CoatingUltra Multi Coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-7.1
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.09 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread49 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAuto FocusVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification0.12x1:3.8★

Pros & Cons

Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Pricing

Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm

No current pricing available

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider