Desiontal 420-800mm

Desiontal 420-800mm

Desiontal
37 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2166 55-200mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2166 55-200mm

Nikon
84 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Desiontal 420-800mm

72 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews

This 420-800mm manual telephoto zoom lens receives mixed feedback. Many users praise its value for astrophotography and long-distance shots, noting good build quality and lightweight design. However, some report issues with color accuracy at long range, difficulty focusing, and one case of incompatibility. Overall, it is seen as a budget-friendly option for amateur photographers willing to work manually.

Pros
  • Budget-friendly for astrophotography
  • Lightweight and portable design
  • Good build quality
  • Versatile 420-800mm range
  • Effective for moon and stars
Cons
  • Color accuracy issues at long distances
  • Difficult to focus manually
  • Heavy for some users
  • Incompatibility with some cameras
  • Requires tripod and remote shutter
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Manual focus 5
🤔 Weight 3
👎 Color accuracy 1
👎 Compatibility 1

Nikon NIKKOR 2166 55-200mm

82 out of 100 medium confidence 15 reviews

The Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6 VR refurbished lens is generally well-received, with many users praising its value, quiet autofocus, and effective vibration reduction. While some note it is not the sharpest lens and has minor build concerns, most find it a great budget-friendly option for casual use, especially for sports and concerts. A few users mention autofocus can be iffy at max zoom, but overall satisfaction is high.

Pros
  • Great value for money
  • Quiet autofocus
  • Effective vibration reduction
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Sharp image quality
Cons
  • Not the sharpest lens
  • Autofocus iffy at max zoom
  • Plastic build feels cheap
  • Missing inner seal on refurb
  • Higher f-stop compromises low light
👍 Value for money 8
🤔 Autofocus performance 5
👍 Image quality 6
🤔 Build quality 4
👍 Vibration reduction 3
👍 Refurbished condition 5

Scores

Budget
Desiontal
45
Nikon
84
Macro
Desiontal
40
Nikon
82
Portrait
Desiontal
37
Nikon
73
Street
Desiontal
31
Nikon
71
Video Cinema
Desiontal
35
Nikon
70
Landscape
Desiontal
37
Nikon
69
Travel
Desiontal
34
Nikon
68
Professional
Desiontal
30
Nikon
63
Wildlife Sports
Desiontal
31
Nikon
61

Specifications

Desiontal 420-800mmNikon NIKKOR 2166 55-200mm
Optics
Typetelephototelephoto
Focal Length Min420 mm55 mm
Focal Length Max800 mm200 mm
Elements—13
Groups—9
ED Elements—2★
CoatingUltra Multi CoatingSuper Integrated Coating (SIC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/4
Min Aperture8.3-164-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountSony ENikon F
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weight0.80 kg0.34 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlySilent Wave Motor
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance800 mm200 mm★
Max Magnification—1:3.5★

Pros & Cons

Desiontal 420-800mm

  • Strong stabilization (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong versatility (70th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (67th percentile)
  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average build (23rd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (30th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR 2166 55-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong versatility (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2166 55-200mm

Scores 84 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 20 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2166 55-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports