Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score
vs
TTArtisan APS-C 14mm f/2.8 14mm

TTArtisan APS-C 14mm f/2.8 14mm

TTArtisan
39 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Nikon
98
TTArtisan
31
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
94
TTArtisan
23
Travel
Nikon
92
TTArtisan
27
Landscape
Nikon
88
TTArtisan
37
Professional
Nikon
83
TTArtisan
32
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
TTArtisan
29
Street
Nikon
81
TTArtisan
35
Portrait
Nikon
78
TTArtisan
35
Macro
Nikon
71
TTArtisan
57

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VRTTArtisan APS-C 14mm f/2.8 14mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min24 mm14 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm14 mm
Elements1913
Groups1510
Aspherical Elements22
ED Elements1★—
CoatingARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/16
Min Aperture4-6.3f/2.8
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades78★
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.57 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm200 mm★
Max Magnification0.28x★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

TTArtisan APS-C 14mm f/2.8 14mm

  • Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong optical (67th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average social proof (25th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (33rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports