Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score
vs
Rokinon AF IO3518-E 35mm

Rokinon AF IO3518-E 35mm

Rokinon
49 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Nikon
98
Rokinon
48
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
94
Rokinon
56
Travel
Nikon
92
Rokinon
55
Landscape
Nikon
88
Rokinon
56
Professional
Nikon
83
Rokinon
53
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Rokinon
45
Street
Nikon
81
Rokinon
61
Portrait
Nikon
78
Rokinon
39
Macro
Nikon
74
Rokinon
48

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VRRokinon AF IO3518-E 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min24 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm35 mm
Elements1910
Groups158
Aspherical Elements22
ED Elements12★
CoatingARNEO and Nano Crystal CoatingsUltra Multi-Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperture4-6.3f/1.8
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.57 kg0.21 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motorlinear STM★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm290 mm★
Max Magnification0.28x★0.17x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Rokinon AF IO3518-E 35mm

  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (71st percentile)
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports