Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF16mmF1.4 WR 16mm

Fujifilm XF16mmF1.4 WR 16mm

Fujifilm
61 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Nikon
98
Fujifilm
53
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
94
Fujifilm
50
Travel
Nikon
92
Fujifilm
48
Landscape
Nikon
88
Fujifilm
53
Professional
Nikon
83
Fujifilm
62
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Fujifilm
54
Street
Nikon
81
Fujifilm
56
Portrait
Nikon
78
Fujifilm
48
Macro
Nikon
74
Fujifilm
57

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VRFujifilm XF16mmF1.4 WR 16mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min24 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm16 mm
Elements1913
Groups1511
Aspherical Elements22
ED Elements12★
CoatingARNEO and Nano Crystal CoatingsNano-GI and HT-EBC
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/16
Min Aperture4-6.3f/1.4
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountNikon ZFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.57 kg0.38 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motor★Automatic
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm150 mm★
Max Magnification0.28x★0.21x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Fujifilm XF16mmF1.4 WR 16mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

No current pricing available

Fujifilm XF16mmF1.4 WR 16mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider