Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score
vs
Lensbaby Velvet 56mm f/1.6 56mm

Lensbaby Velvet 56mm f/1.6 56mm

Lensbaby
36 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Nikon
98
Lensbaby
40
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
94
Lensbaby
17
Travel
Nikon
92
Lensbaby
26
Landscape
Nikon
88
Lensbaby
18
Professional
Nikon
83
Lensbaby
23
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Lensbaby
25
Street
Nikon
81
Lensbaby
26
Portrait
Nikon
78
Lensbaby
32
Macro
Nikon
71
Lensbaby
46

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VRLensbaby Velvet 56mm f/1.6 56mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min24 mm56 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm56 mm
Elements194
Groups153
Aspherical Elements2★—
ED Elements1★—
CoatingARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/16
Min Aperture4-6.3f/1.6
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountNikon ZNikon F
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.57 kg0.41 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm127 mm★
Max Magnification0.28x1:2★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Lensbaby Velvet 56mm f/1.6 56mm

  • Strong macro (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average optical (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports