TTArtisan AF 40mm f/2 40mm

TTArtisan AF 40mm f/2 40mm

TTArtisan
41 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron
97 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

TTArtisan AF 40mm f/2 40mm

60 out of 100 low confidence 7 reviews

The TTArtisan 40mm f/2.0 pancake lens receives mixed feedback from users. While many praise its compact metal build, satisfying aperture ring, and excellent value for the price, significant issues with autofocus performance—including hunting, pulsing, and noise—are frequently mentioned. Image quality is generally good, but users note heavy vignetting and flare when shooting into strong light. Overall, it is seen as a budget-friendly option with trade-offs in AF reliability.

Pros
  • Compact metal build
  • Satisfying aperture ring
  • Excellent value for money
  • Good image quality
  • Fast f/2.0 aperture for low light
Cons
  • Poor autofocus performance
  • Loud autofocus motor
  • Heavy vignetting
  • Flare when shooting into light
  • Occasional misconnection with camera
👎 Autofocus performance 5
👍 Build quality 4
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Image quality 4
👎 Vignetting 2
👎 Flare 2

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

85 out of 100 high confidence 62 reviews

The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD lens is widely praised for its sharpness, versatile zoom range, constant aperture, and effective stabilization, making it an excellent all-around lens for APS-C cameras. Users appreciate its solid build quality and value for money, though many note it is noticeably heavier and larger than typical kit lenses, which can feel unbalanced on smaller camera bodies. A few reviewers mention minor issues like chromatic aberration at the longer end and noise from the aperture blades at certain settings, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • sharp image quality across zoom range
  • constant f/2.8 aperture
  • effective image stabilization
  • fast and quiet autofocus
  • versatile 17-70mm focal range
Cons
  • heavy and large for APS-C body
  • chromatic aberration at 50-70mm
  • aperture blade noise above f/5.6
  • short zoom throw initially stiff
  • no aperture ring on Fuji version
👍 Image quality 27
👍 Build quality 15
🤔 Weight and size 18
👍 Value for money 14
👍 Stabilization 12
👍 Autofocus performance 11

Scores

Video Cinema
TTArtisan
48
Tamron
98
Budget
TTArtisan
44
Tamron
92
Macro
TTArtisan
47
Tamron
91
Professional
TTArtisan
46
Tamron
91
Portrait
TTArtisan
42
Tamron
91
Travel
TTArtisan
42
Tamron
87
Landscape
TTArtisan
32
Tamron
84
Street
TTArtisan
55
Tamron
78
Wildlife Sports
TTArtisan
44
Tamron
75

Specifications

TTArtisan AF 40mm f/2 40mmTamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min40 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm70 mm
Elements916
Groups612
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—2★
Coating—Fluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.18 kg★0.54 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM Stepping AF Motor★RXD
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance400 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:4.8★

Pros & Cons

TTArtisan AF 40mm f/2 40mm

  • Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (31st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

  • Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

TTArtisan AF 40mm f/2 40mm

No current pricing available

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider