Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
86 Overall Score
vs
ARRI Leitz Cine THALIA 65 20mm T3.6 Cine 20mm

ARRI Leitz Cine THALIA 65 20mm T3.6 Cine 20mm

ARRI
37 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Panasonic
99
ARRI
40
Budget
Panasonic
91
ARRI
37
Landscape
Panasonic
86
ARRI
13
Travel
Panasonic
86
ARRI
13
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
ARRI
36
Street
Panasonic
80
ARRI
36
Professional
Panasonic
80
ARRI
27
Portrait
Panasonic
77
ARRI
53
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
77
ARRI
24

Specifications

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mmARRI Leitz Cine THALIA 65 20mm T3.6 Cine 20mm
Optics
Typezoom—
Focal Length Min28 mm20 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm20 mm
Elements17—
Groups13—
Aspherical Elements1★—
ED Elements4★—
CoatingFluorine coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4—
Min Aperture4-7.1—
Constant✗—
Diaphragm Blades915★
Build
MountL-MountARRI PL
Formatfull-frame★Large Format (60 mm Image Circle)
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.41 kg★1.95 kg
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus—
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm★400 mm
Max Magnification0.5x★—

Pros & Cons

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

ARRI Leitz Cine THALIA 65 20mm T3.6 Cine 20mm

  • Strong bokeh (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average build (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports