Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
86 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

Sigma
37 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Panasonic
99
Sigma
49
Budget
Panasonic
91
Sigma
40
Landscape
Panasonic
86
Sigma
37
Travel
Panasonic
86
Sigma
32
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Sigma
39
Street
Panasonic
80
Sigma
33
Professional
Panasonic
80
Sigma
37
Portrait
Panasonic
77
Sigma
32
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
77
Sigma
31

Specifications

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mmSigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min28 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm105 mm
Elements1718
Groups1313
Aspherical Elements1★—
ED Elements4★—
CoatingFluorine coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4T22
Min Aperture4-7.1T3
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades912★
Build
MountL-MountL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.41 kg★1.30 kg
Filter Thread67 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm★400 mm
Max Magnification0.5x1:3.1★

Pros & Cons

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

  • Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (73rd percentile)
  • Below average build (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports