Fujifilm GF 45-100mm f/4 R LM WR
Fujifilm
61 Overall Score
vs
Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E
Hasselblad
36 Overall Score
Scores
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Professional
Video Cinema
Budget
Travel
Macro
Street
Portrait
Specifications
| Fujifilm GF 45-100mm f/4 R LM WR | Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 45 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 100 mm | 100 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 16 |
| Groups | 12 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 2 | 5★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/32 | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | 2.8-4 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm G | Hasselblad XCD |
| Format | medium-format | medium-format |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 1.00 kg | 0.89 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 86 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Linear motor★ | stepping motor |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | — |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 650 mm | 500 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.13x | 1:4.0★ |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm GF 45-100mm f/4 R LM WR
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average bokeh (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average macro (31st percentile)
Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E
- Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (79th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average social proof (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average build (21st percentile)
Pricing
Fujifilm GF 45-100mm f/4 R LM WR
Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E
No current pricing available
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm GF 45-100mm f/4 R LM WR
Scores 61 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
