Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II 16-55mm

Fujifilm XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II 16-55mm

Fujifilm
71 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
86
Fujifilm
79
Street
Sigma
86
Fujifilm
70
Macro
Sigma
82
Fujifilm
57
Portrait
Sigma
81
Fujifilm
55
Travel
Sigma
80
Fujifilm
77
Budget
Sigma
75
Fujifilm
77
Landscape
Sigma
71
Fujifilm
76
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
66
Fujifilm
75
Video Cinema
Sigma
74
Fujifilm
74

Specifications

Sigma 207975Fujifilm XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II 16-55mm
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoomzoom
Focal Length Min10 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm55 mm
Elements1316
Groups1011
Aspherical Elements14
ED Elements41
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades711
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.26 kg0.41 kg
Filter Thread67 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusLinear motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance117 mm300 mm
Max Magnification1:40.2x

Pros & Cons

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Fujifilm XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II 16-55mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (35th percentile)

Pricing

Fujifilm XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II 16-55mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Better at:

MacroStreetTravelPortraitProfessional

Fujifilm XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II 16-55mm Better at:

LandscapeWildlife Sports

Also Consider