Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Viltrox
67 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron
98 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 23 reviews

The Viltrox 56mm f/1.7 is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, lightweight design, and outstanding value for money. Users consistently highlight its impressive image quality, with sharp details and pleasing bokeh, often comparing it favorably to much more expensive lenses. While the autofocus is generally reliable for portraits and stills, some users note it can be noisy and not as fast as native Fuji lenses. A few isolated concerns about dust ingress and the plastic build have been mentioned, but overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Excellent value for money
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Good low-light performance
Cons
  • Noisy autofocus (some users)
  • Autofocus slower than native lenses
  • Plastic build
  • Dust ingress reported
  • No physical aperture ring
👍 Image quality 18
👍 Value for money 15
🤔 Build quality 12
🤔 Autofocus performance 11
👍 Size and weight 10
👍 Bokeh 7

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

88 out of 100 medium confidence 20 reviews

The Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and lightweight design, making it a versatile and affordable alternative to Sony's GM lenses. Users appreciate its performance in portraits and low light, though some note the plastic build and lack of weather sealing as drawbacks. Overall, it is considered an excellent value for both enthusiasts and professionals.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile focal range
  • Good value for money
Cons
  • Plastic build quality
  • No weather sealing
  • Zoom ring reversed from focus ring
  • Slightly long for discrete use
  • Colors slightly duller than GM lenses
👍 Image quality 12
👍 Autofocus performance 10
🤔 Build quality 8
👍 Value for money 7
👍 Weight and portability 6
👍 Low light performance 5

Scores

Video Cinema
Viltrox
62
Tamron
97
Professional
Viltrox
54
Tamron
93
Portrait
Viltrox
63
Tamron
93
Budget
Viltrox
62
Tamron
92
Macro
Viltrox
59
Tamron
88
Street
Viltrox
72
Tamron
83
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
53
Tamron
79
Landscape
Viltrox
55
Tamron
78
Travel
Viltrox
55
Tamron
74

Specifications

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mmTamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min56 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm75 mm
Elements1117
Groups915
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements4★2
Coatinghigh-definition nano-multilayer coatingFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.7f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.17 kg★0.54 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance550 mm180 mm★
Max Magnification1:9.091:2.7

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong optical (71st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm is R$6,511 cheaper (7.6x less).

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm0.068score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G20.013score per dollar

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm offers 5.2x better value for money

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider