Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Viltrox
68 Overall Score
vs
Yongnuo YN23mm F1.4S DA DSM WL 23mm

Yongnuo YN23mm F1.4S DA DSM WL 23mm

Yongnuo
68 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 23 reviews

The Viltrox 56mm f/1.7 is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, lightweight design, and outstanding value for money. Users consistently highlight its impressive image quality, with sharp details and pleasing bokeh, often comparing it favorably to much more expensive lenses. While the autofocus is generally reliable for portraits and stills, some users note it can be noisy and not as fast as native Fuji lenses. A few isolated concerns about dust ingress and the plastic build have been mentioned, but overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Excellent value for money
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Good low-light performance
Cons
  • Noisy autofocus (some users)
  • Autofocus slower than native lenses
  • Plastic build
  • Dust ingress reported
  • No physical aperture ring
👍 Image quality 18
👍 Value for money 15
🤔 Build quality 12
🤔 Autofocus performance 11
👍 Size and weight 10
👍 Bokeh 7

Yongnuo YN23mm F1.4S DA DSM WL 23mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 19 reviews

The Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and excellent build quality. Users highlight its performance in low light and video work, with many noting it as a significant upgrade. A few Q&A entries address concerns about internal movement when off, which is confirmed as normal stabilizer behavior.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Excellent build quality
  • Great low-light performance
  • Internal zoom mechanism
Cons
  • Internal movement when off (normal but concerning)
  • Heavier than similar lenses
  • Not parfocal
  • Focus-by-wire system
👍 Image quality 6
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👍 Build quality 4
👍 Low light performance 3
👎 Internal movement concerns 3
👎 Weight 2

Scores

Travel
Viltrox
72
Yongnuo
53
Street
Viltrox
72
Yongnuo
59
Professional
Viltrox
62
Yongnuo
70
Macro
Viltrox
60
Yongnuo
69
Landscape
Viltrox
67
Yongnuo
59
Video Cinema
Viltrox
62
Yongnuo
66
Budget
Viltrox
65
Yongnuo
55
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
62
Yongnuo
64
Portrait
Viltrox
62
Yongnuo
53

Specifications

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mmYongnuo YN23mm F1.4S DA DSM WL 23mm
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min56 mm23 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm23 mm
Elements1111
Groups99
ED Elements4★3
Coatingmulti-layer coatingsnano-multilayer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/16
Min Aperturef/1.7f/1.4
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.17 kg★0.36 kg
Filter Thread52 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★DSM stepping motor
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance550 mm300 mm★
Max Magnification1:9.091x

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

  • Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (75th percentile)
  • Strong optical (71st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Yongnuo YN23mm F1.4S DA DSM WL 23mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong build (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Yongnuo YN23mm F1.4S DA DSM WL 23mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

═ Tie

Both products are closely matched - Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm wins 3 specs while Yongnuo YN23mm F1.4S DA DSM WL 23mm wins 3.

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscape

Yongnuo YN23mm F1.4S DA DSM WL 23mm Better at:

MacroProfessionalVideo Cinema

Also Consider