Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Viltrox
67 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 23 reviews

The Viltrox 56mm f/1.7 is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, lightweight design, and outstanding value for money. Users consistently highlight its impressive image quality, with sharp details and pleasing bokeh, often comparing it favorably to much more expensive lenses. While the autofocus is generally reliable for portraits and stills, some users note it can be noisy and not as fast as native Fuji lenses. A few isolated concerns about dust ingress and the plastic build have been mentioned, but overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Excellent value for money
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Good low-light performance
Cons
  • Noisy autofocus (some users)
  • Autofocus slower than native lenses
  • Plastic build
  • Dust ingress reported
  • No physical aperture ring
👍 Image quality 18
👍 Value for money 15
🤔 Build quality 12
🤔 Autofocus performance 11
👍 Size and weight 10
👍 Bokeh 7

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Scores

Macro
Viltrox
59
Tamron
91
Budget
Viltrox
62
Tamron
91
Portrait
Viltrox
63
Tamron
87
Landscape
Viltrox
55
Tamron
86
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
53
Tamron
85
Professional
Viltrox
54
Tamron
84
Video Cinema
Viltrox
62
Tamron
82
Street
Viltrox
72
Tamron
81
Travel
Viltrox
55
Tamron
81

Specifications

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min56 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm300 mm
Elements1120
Groups913
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements4★2
Coatinghigh-definition nano-multilayer coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/4
Min Aperturef/1.74-7.1
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.17 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance550 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification1:9.091:2.8

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong optical (71st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Pricing

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm is R$4,501 cheaper (5.6x less).

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm0.068score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD0.018score per dollar

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm offers 3.8x better value for money

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider