Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Viltrox
67 Overall Score
vs
Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 35mm

Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 35mm

Yongnuo
45 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 23 reviews

The Viltrox 56mm f/1.7 is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, lightweight design, and outstanding value for money. Users consistently highlight its impressive image quality, with sharp details and pleasing bokeh, often comparing it favorably to much more expensive lenses. While the autofocus is generally reliable for portraits and stills, some users note it can be noisy and not as fast as native Fuji lenses. A few isolated concerns about dust ingress and the plastic build have been mentioned, but overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Excellent value for money
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Good low-light performance
Cons
  • Noisy autofocus (some users)
  • Autofocus slower than native lenses
  • Plastic build
  • Dust ingress reported
  • No physical aperture ring
👍 Image quality 18
👍 Value for money 15
🤔 Build quality 12
🤔 Autofocus performance 11
👍 Size and weight 10
👍 Bokeh 7

Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 35mm

72 out of 100 high confidence 39 reviews

The Yongnuo 35mm f/2 EF lens is widely praised for its incredible value and decent image quality, especially for the price. Many users find it a great budget option for photography and filmmaking, though some report autofocus issues and a cheap build quality. Overall, it's a solid choice for those on a tight budget who don't need professional-grade performance.

Pros
  • Incredible value for money
  • Decent image quality
  • Lightweight and portable
  • Great for budget filmmaking
  • Good for small spaces
Cons
  • Autofocus issues
  • Cheap build quality
  • Not very sharp
  • Potential aperture failure
  • Slow autofocus in low light
👍 Value for money 8
👍 Image quality 7
👎 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Build quality 4
🤔 Low light performance 3
🤔 Sharpness 3

Scores

Street
Viltrox
72
Yongnuo
45
Portrait
Viltrox
63
Yongnuo
30
Budget
Viltrox
62
Yongnuo
45
Video Cinema
Viltrox
62
Yongnuo
33
Macro
Viltrox
59
Yongnuo
52
Travel
Viltrox
55
Yongnuo
44
Landscape
Viltrox
55
Yongnuo
39
Professional
Viltrox
54
Yongnuo
33
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
53
Yongnuo
35

Specifications

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mmYongnuo YN 35mm f/2 35mm
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min56 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm35 mm
Elements117
Groups95
ED Elements4★—
Coatinghigh-definition nano-multilayer coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/22
Min Aperturef/1.7f/2
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountSony ENikon F
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✗
Weight0.17 kg0.15 kg★
Filter Thread52 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Autofocus
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance550 mm250 mm★
Max Magnification1:9.091:4.35

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong optical (71st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 35mm

  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong macro (78th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 35mm is R$299 cheaper (1.4x less).

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 35mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Scores 67 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 20 specs.

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider