Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox
70 Overall Score
vs
TTArtisan AF 40mm f/2 40mm

TTArtisan AF 40mm f/2 40mm

TTArtisan
41 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

85 out of 100 high confidence 95 reviews

The Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.7 lens is widely loved for its sharp image quality, fast aperture, and surprisingly low price. Users praise its lightweight design, compact size, and quick autofocus, making it an excellent everyday walk-around lens. Some note autofocus can be noisier or slower than premium lenses, and a few report chromatic aberration in high-contrast scenes. A handful of complaints involve inconsistent packaging or compatibility misunderstandings, but the overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality wide open
  • Fast f/1.7 aperture for low light
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Great value for the price
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
Cons
  • Autofocus noise in quiet environments
  • Chromatic aberration in high contrast
  • No weather sealing
  • Slow autofocus in low light
  • Missing aperture ring
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Value for money 35
👍 Build quality 30
🤔 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Bokeh 15
👍 Low light performance 18

TTArtisan AF 40mm f/2 40mm

60 out of 100 low confidence 7 reviews

The TTArtisan 40mm f/2.0 pancake lens receives mixed feedback from users. While many praise its compact metal build, satisfying aperture ring, and excellent value for the price, significant issues with autofocus performance—including hunting, pulsing, and noise—are frequently mentioned. Image quality is generally good, but users note heavy vignetting and flare when shooting into strong light. Overall, it is seen as a budget-friendly option with trade-offs in AF reliability.

Pros
  • Compact metal build
  • Satisfying aperture ring
  • Excellent value for money
  • Good image quality
  • Fast f/2.0 aperture for low light
Cons
  • Poor autofocus performance
  • Loud autofocus motor
  • Heavy vignetting
  • Flare when shooting into light
  • Occasional misconnection with camera
👎 Autofocus performance 5
👍 Build quality 4
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Image quality 4
👎 Vignetting 2
👎 Flare 2

Scores

Street
Viltrox
71
TTArtisan
55
Budget
Viltrox
66
TTArtisan
46
Macro
Viltrox
64
TTArtisan
47
Portrait
Viltrox
62
TTArtisan
42
Video Cinema
Viltrox
61
TTArtisan
48
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
59
TTArtisan
44
Travel
Viltrox
56
TTArtisan
42
Landscape
Viltrox
54
TTArtisan
32
Professional
Viltrox
53
TTArtisan
46

Specifications

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mmTTArtisan AF 40mm f/2 40mm
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min35 mm40 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm40 mm
Elements119
Groups96
Aspherical Elements1★—
ED Elements1★—
Coatingnano multi-layer coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/16
Min Aperturef/1.7f/2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountFujifilm XNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗—
Weight0.17 kg★0.18 kg
Filter Thread52 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMSTM Stepping AF Motor
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance330 mm★400 mm
Max Magnification1:7.7★—

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong macro (68th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

TTArtisan AF 40mm f/2 40mm

  • Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (31st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Scores 70 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports