Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-691

Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-691

Carl Zeiss
42 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron
99 Overall Score

Scores

Video Cinema
Carl Zeiss
39
Tamron
99
Budget
Carl Zeiss
45
Tamron
97
Professional
Carl Zeiss
35
Tamron
96
Macro
Carl Zeiss
19
Tamron
91
Portrait
Carl Zeiss
53
Tamron
90
Landscape
Carl Zeiss
24
Tamron
89
Travel
Carl Zeiss
29
Tamron
88
Street
Carl Zeiss
48
Tamron
81
Wildlife Sports
Carl Zeiss
36
Tamron
80

Specifications

Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-691Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min18 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm70 mm
Elements16
Groups12
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony E
FormatAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.33 kg0.54 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeRXD
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm
Max Magnification1:4.8

Pros & Cons

Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-691

  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD is R$8,400 cheaper (2.8x less).

Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-6910.003score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD0.021score per dollar

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD offers 7.0x better value for money

Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-691

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Verdict

Winner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Scores 99 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider