Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon
86 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm

Fujifilm
68 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

82 out of 100 high confidence 331 reviews

The Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM lens is widely praised for its excellent sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and lightweight design, making it a fantastic value for amateur photographers and wildlife enthusiasts. Many users highlight the impressive image quality at the long end and the effective image stabilization, though some note softness beyond 200mm and noticeable vignetting at full zoom. A few reviewers experienced quality control issues like blurry images or a non-functional focus ring, but the overwhelming consensus is that this lens delivers outstanding performance for its price point.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness for the price
  • Fast and silent STM autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Great value for money
Cons
  • Softness beyond 200mm
  • Noticeable vignetting at full zoom
  • Plastic build quality
  • Electronic manual focus requires camera power
  • Slow maximum aperture (f/5.6 at 250mm)
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Autofocus performance 30
👍 Value for money 35
🤔 Build quality 20
👍 Image stabilization 18
🤔 Sharpness at long end 25

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm

92 out of 100 high confidence 85 reviews

This lens is widely praised as one of Fujifilm's best, with exceptional sharpness, beautiful bokeh, and a very close focusing distance that makes it versatile for portraits, landscapes, and street photography. Users love the solid build quality and weather sealing, though some note the aperture ring is too loose and the lens is heavy and pricey. Overall, it's a must-have for serious Fuji shooters.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Beautiful bokeh
  • Close focusing capability
  • Solid build quality
  • Weather sealing
Cons
  • Loose aperture ring
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Expensive
  • Plastic lens hood
  • Autofocus noise in video
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Build quality 20
👍 Close focusing 18
👎 Aperture ring 3
🤔 Weight and size 8
👍 Value for money 10

Scores

Budget
Canon
90
Fujifilm
58
Travel
Canon
85
Fujifilm
55
Street
Canon
81
Fujifilm
59
Portrait
Canon
80
Fujifilm
55
Wildlife Sports
Canon
78
Fujifilm
52
Video Cinema
Canon
76
Fujifilm
57
Landscape
Canon
74
Fujifilm
59
Professional
Canon
68
Fujifilm
65
Macro
Canon
62
Fujifilm
59

Specifications

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STMFujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min55 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max250 mm16 mm
Elements1513
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements02★
ED Elements12★
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingNano-GI and HT-EBC
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/16
Min Aperture4-5.6f/1.4
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon EF-SFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.38 kg0.38 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Autofocus
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance850 mm150 mm★
Max Magnification0.29x★0.21x

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average macro (31st percentile)

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm

  • Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong build (79th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Pricing

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

No current pricing available

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider