Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Zeiss Biogon T* ZM 1365-652-L 25mm

Zeiss Biogon T* ZM 1365-652-L 25mm

Zeiss
52 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Zeiss
50
Macro
Nikon
88
Zeiss
39
Budget
Nikon
85
Zeiss
50
Street
Nikon
84
Zeiss
63
Portrait
Nikon
84
Zeiss
66
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Zeiss
54
Landscape
Nikon
79
Zeiss
39
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Zeiss
33
Travel
Nikon
70
Zeiss
41

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Zeiss Biogon T* ZM 1365-652-L 25mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min17 mm25 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm25 mm
Elements139
Groups117
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-CoatedT* coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades910★
Build
MountNikon ZLeica M
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.45 kg0.26 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm46 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★0.05625

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Zeiss Biogon T* ZM 1365-652-L 25mm

  • Strong bokeh (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong build (79th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average macro (29th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

No current pricing available

Zeiss Biogon T* ZM 1365-652-L 25mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider