Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR

Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR

Fujifilm
66 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Fujifilm
62
Macro
Nikon
88
Fujifilm
58
Budget
Nikon
85
Fujifilm
74
Street
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
72
Portrait
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
45
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Fujifilm
55
Travel
Nikon
70
Fujifilm
82
Landscape
Nikon
79
Fujifilm
69
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Fujifilm
68

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm50 mm
Elements1311
Groups119
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements33
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.82.8-4.8
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg0.24 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorLinear motor★
Stabilization✗✗
Stabilization Stops—7 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★240 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★0.3x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (79th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

No current pricing available

Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR Better at:

Travel

Also Consider