Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm

Fujifilm
67 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Fujifilm
65
Budget
Nikon
85
Fujifilm
61
Street
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
59
Macro
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
58
Portrait
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
51
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Fujifilm
57
Landscape
Nikon
79
Fujifilm
57
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Fujifilm
52
Travel
Nikon
70
Fujifilm
53

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm16 mm
Elements1313
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements3★2
CoatingMulti-CoatedNano-GI and HT-EBC
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg0.38 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★Autofocus
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm150 mm★
Max Magnification1:5.26★0.21x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm

  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

No current pricing available

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider