Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Rokinon RK20M-C 20mm

Rokinon RK20M-C 20mm

Rokinon
42 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Rokinon
32
Macro
Nikon
88
Rokinon
64
Budget
Nikon
85
Rokinon
32
Street
Nikon
84
Rokinon
33
Portrait
Nikon
84
Rokinon
27
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Rokinon
27
Landscape
Nikon
79
Rokinon
38
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Rokinon
24
Travel
Nikon
70
Rokinon
30

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Rokinon RK20M-C 20mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm20 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm20 mm
Elements1313
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements33
CoatingMulti-CoatedUltra Multi-Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.8
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.45 kg★0.50 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★200 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Rokinon RK20M-C 20mm

  • Strong optical (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

No current pricing available

Rokinon RK20M-C 20mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider