Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Canon L-series EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Canon L-series EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Canon
83 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Canon L-series EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

88 out of 100 high confidence 186 reviews

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, lightweight design, and effective image stabilization. Users consistently highlight the lens's superb image quality, fast autofocus, and excellent value compared to the heavier f/2.8 version. A few criticisms include the lack of an included tripod collar and some reports of IS noise or autofocus issues in low light. Overall, it is considered a top-tier telephoto zoom for enthusiasts and professionals who prioritize portability.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness across zoom range
  • Lightweight and portable design
  • Effective 5-stop image stabilization
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Excellent image quality and color
Cons
  • Tripod collar not included
  • IS noise in some units
  • Autofocus issues in low light
  • No teleconverter compatibility
  • High price point
👍 Image quality 35
👍 Sharpness 28
👍 Weight and portability 22
👍 Image stabilization 18
👍 Autofocus performance 15
👍 Value for money 12

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Canon
82
Budget
Nikon
84
Canon
88
Portrait
Nikon
87
Canon
81
Macro
Nikon
84
Canon
56
Street
Nikon
83
Canon
75
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Canon
79
Landscape
Nikon
82
Canon
72
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
72
Canon
71
Travel
Nikon
70
Canon
67

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mmCanon L-series EF 70-200mm f/4L USM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm200 mm
Elements1316
Groups1113
Aspherical Elements3★0
ED Elements3★2
CoatingMulti-CoatedFluorite element
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperturef/2.8f/4
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg★0.71 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motorring-type USM★
Stabilization✗✗
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★1.19 m
Max Magnification1:5.26★0.28x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Canon L-series EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average macro (30th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

MacroStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo Cinema

Canon L-series EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Better at:

Budget