Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Leica Macro-Elmar-M 90mm Summarit-M Lens 90mm

Leica Macro-Elmar-M 90mm Summarit-M Lens 90mm

Leica
17 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Leica
13
Budget
Nikon
85
Leica
13
Street
Nikon
84
Leica
17
Macro
Nikon
84
Leica
20
Portrait
Nikon
84
Leica
10
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Leica
13
Landscape
Nikon
79
Leica
10
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Leica
11
Travel
Nikon
70
Leica
21

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Leica Macro-Elmar-M 90mm Summarit-M Lens 90mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min17 mm90 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm90 mm
Elements134
Groups114
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coatedmulti-layered anti-reflective coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/4
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon ZLeica M
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg0.23 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm39 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★792 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:2

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Leica Macro-Elmar-M 90mm Summarit-M Lens 90mm

  • Strong build (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average optical (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports