Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
7Artisans 16mm T2.1 Hope Series Professional Cine 16mm

7Artisans 16mm T2.1 Hope Series Professional Cine 16mm

7Artisans
36 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
7Artisans
30
Portrait
Nikon
89
7Artisans
52
Street
Nikon
86
7Artisans
38
Budget
Nikon
86
7Artisans
38
Macro
Nikon
85
7Artisans
20
Landscape
Nikon
83
7Artisans
20
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
7Artisans
44
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
7Artisans
32
Travel
Nikon
75
7Artisans
19

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.87Artisans 16mm T2.1 Hope Series Professional Cine 16mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min17 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm16 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon ZCanon RF
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg1.00 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

7Artisans 16mm T2.1 Hope Series Professional Cine 16mm

  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average build (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

No current pricing available

7Artisans 16mm T2.1 Hope Series Professional Cine 16mm

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider