Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 20-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DG

Sigma Contemporary 20-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DG

Sigma
72 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Sigma
64
Budget
Nikon
85
Sigma
69
Street
Nikon
84
Sigma
61
Macro
Nikon
84
Sigma
72
Portrait
Nikon
84
Sigma
59
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Sigma
55
Landscape
Nikon
79
Sigma
71
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Sigma
59
Travel
Nikon
70
Sigma
64

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma Contemporary 20-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DG
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm20 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm200 mm
Elements1318
Groups1114
Aspherical Elements34★
ED Elements34★
CoatingMulti-Coatedwater and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/6.3
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-6.3
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg★0.55 kg
Filter Thread67 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★HLA (High-response Linear Actuator)
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★250 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:2

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma Contemporary 20-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DG

  • Strong optical (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong macro (78th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports