Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon
78 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Canon
75
Budget
Nikon
85
Canon
80
Landscape
Nikon
79
Canon
85
Street
Nikon
84
Canon
63
Macro
Nikon
84
Canon
65
Portrait
Nikon
84
Canon
50
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Canon
74
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Canon
74
Travel
Nikon
70
Canon
69

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm15 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements1316
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements3★2
CoatingMulti-CoatedAir-Sphere coating, Fluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZCanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg★0.84 kg
Filter Thread67 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorNano USM★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★280 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★0.21x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

No current pricing available

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitProfessionalVideo Cinema

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM Better at:

Landscape

Also Consider