Altura Photo UM2267

Altura Photo UM2267

Altura Photo
77 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

Tamron
68 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Altura Photo
89
Tamron
77
Travel
Altura Photo
59
Tamron
79
Street
Altura Photo
77
Tamron
62
Budget
Altura Photo
68
Tamron
74
Landscape
Altura Photo
55
Tamron
73
Portrait
Altura Photo
69
Tamron
50
Video Cinema
Altura Photo
64
Tamron
58
Wildlife Sports
Altura Photo
62
Tamron
61
Professional
Altura Photo
60
Tamron
59

Specifications

Altura Photo UM2267Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min18 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm
Elements17
Groups13
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
Coatingmulticoated glass opticsInternal Surface coatings, multiple-layered coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/18
Min Aperture3.5-6.3
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountScrew-on lens fits camera lenses with a 49mm front filter threadNikon F
FormatAPS-C
Weight0.30 kg0.40 kg
Filter Thread49 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMAuto Focus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance45 mm450 mm
Max Magnification1:3.7

Pros & Cons

Altura Photo UM2267

  • Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (34th percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Altura Photo UM2267

Scores 77 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 20 specs.

Altura Photo UM2267 Better at:

MacroStreetPortraitVideo Cinema

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm Better at:

BudgetTravelLandscape