Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 158-38mm

Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 158-38mm

Canon
60 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score

Scores

Street
Canon
58
Nikon
97
Budget
Canon
58
Nikon
94
Travel
Canon
51
Nikon
85
Video Cinema
Canon
49
Nikon
83
Portrait
Canon
35
Nikon
81
Landscape
Canon
40
Nikon
80
Wildlife Sports
Canon
47
Nikon
76
Professional
Canon
47
Nikon
74
Macro
Canon
47
Nikon
70

Specifications

Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 158-38mmNikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min24 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max24 mm50 mm
Elements69
Groups57
Aspherical Elements14★
ED Elements—1★
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingSuper Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-6.3
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountCanon EF-SNikon Z
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✗✗
Weight0.13 kg★0.14 kg
Filter Thread52 mm46 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Stepping Motor
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance160 mm★200 mm
Max Magnification0.27x★0.2x

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 158-38mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports