Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R 35mm

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R 35mm

Fujifilm
60 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Landscape
Fujifilm
43
Sigma
100
Budget
Fujifilm
58
Sigma
99
Macro
Fujifilm
46
Sigma
96
Travel
Fujifilm
50
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
52
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
43
Sigma
87
Portrait
Fujifilm
45
Sigma
85
Professional
Fujifilm
51
Sigma
84
Street
Fujifilm
61
Sigma
80

Specifications

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R 35mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm300 mm
Elements820
Groups614
Aspherical Elements14★
ED Elements25★
CoatingSuper EBCwater- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/3.5
Min Aperturef/1.43.5-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountFujifilm XSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.19 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusHLA
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification0.17x1:2★

Pros & Cons

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R 35mm

  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average bokeh (28th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Pricing

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R 35mm

No current pricing available

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider