Fujifilm XF500mmF5.6 R LM OIS WR 500mm

Fujifilm XF500mmF5.6 R LM OIS WR 500mm

Fujifilm
55 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Fujifilm
65
Nikon
89
Budget
Fujifilm
53
Nikon
85
Street
Fujifilm
53
Nikon
84
Macro
Fujifilm
54
Nikon
84
Portrait
Fujifilm
45
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
72
Nikon
82
Landscape
Fujifilm
58
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
70
Nikon
73
Travel
Fujifilm
43
Nikon
70

Specifications

Fujifilm XF500mmF5.6 R LM OIS WR 500mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typesuper-telephotozoom
Focal Length Min500 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max500 mm28 mm
Elements2113
Groups1411
Aspherical Elements03★
ED Elements7★3
Coating—Multi-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/5.6f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountFujifilm XNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight1.33 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread95 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear motor★Stepping Motor
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance2.75 m190 mm★
Max Magnification0.2x1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Fujifilm XF500mmF5.6 R LM OIS WR 500mm

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average build (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
  • Below average macro (29th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports