Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.7 XF 56mm

Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.7 XF 56mm

Viltrox
59 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Viltrox
55
Nikon
89
Budget
Viltrox
58
Nikon
85
Street
Viltrox
76
Nikon
84
Macro
Viltrox
55
Nikon
84
Portrait
Viltrox
75
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Viltrox
58
Nikon
82
Landscape
Viltrox
38
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
47
Nikon
73
Travel
Viltrox
46
Nikon
70

Specifications

Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.7 XF 56mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Type—zoom
Focal Length Min56 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm28 mm
Elements1113
Groups911
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—3★
Coating—Multi-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.7f/2.8
Min Aperturef/16f/2.8
Constant—✓★
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountFujifilm XNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.17 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusStepping Motor★
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance550 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification1:9.091:5.26

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.7 XF 56mm

  • Strong bokeh (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong aperture (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports