Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Viltrox
71 Overall Score
vs
Canon HL-C 60mm

Canon HL-C 60mm

Canon
42 Overall Score

Scores

Street
Viltrox
75
Canon
51
Portrait
Viltrox
69
Canon
53
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
68
Canon
41
Budget
Viltrox
66
Canon
43
Video Cinema
Viltrox
60
Canon
53
Professional
Viltrox
60
Canon
46
Macro
Viltrox
59
Canon
25
Travel
Viltrox
59
Canon
46
Landscape
Viltrox
57
Canon
32

Specifications

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mmCanon HL-C 60mm
Optics
Typeprimestandard
Focal Length Min56 mm60 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm60 mm
Elements11
Groups9
ED Elements4
CoatingHD nano-coating
Aperture
Max Aperture16f/8
Min Aperture1.78
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony ECanon F-mount
FormatAPS-C
Weight0.17 kg0.03 kg
Filter Thread52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMmanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance550 mm
Max Magnification1:9.09

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Strong optical (68th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Canon HL-C 60mm

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (81th percentile)81th %ile
  • Below average macro (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average optical (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile

Pricing

Canon HL-C 60mm is R$871 cheaper (7.4x less).

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm0.070score per dollar
vs
Canon HL-C 60mm0.308score per dollar

Canon HL-C 60mm offers 4.4x better value for money

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Canon HL-C 60mm

Verdict

Winner: Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Scores 71 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 19 specs.

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider