Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Overall Score
vs
BLAZAR LENS Beetle 32mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 32mm

BLAZAR LENS Beetle 32mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 32mm

BLAZAR LENS
51 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Nikon
86
BLAZAR LENS
47
Portrait
Nikon
79
BLAZAR LENS
59
Street
Nikon
75
BLAZAR LENS
53
Macro
Nikon
73
BLAZAR LENS
42
Travel
Nikon
71
BLAZAR LENS
39
Video Cinema
Nikon
71
BLAZAR LENS
50
Landscape
Nikon
68
BLAZAR LENS
27
Professional
Nikon
66
BLAZAR LENS
43
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
65
BLAZAR LENS
29

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmBLAZAR LENS Beetle 32mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 32mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm32 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm32 mm
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingSuper Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5T3.2
Min Aperture3.5-5.6T3.2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountNikon FNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.48 kg0.29 kg
Filter Thread67 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-Smanual focus only
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm460 mm

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile

BLAZAR LENS Beetle 32mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 32mm

  • Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Strong build (77th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 19 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports