Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM

Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM

Canon
87 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM

82 out of 100 high confidence 331 reviews

The Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM lens is widely praised for its excellent sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and lightweight design, making it a fantastic value for amateur photographers and wildlife enthusiasts. Many users highlight the impressive image quality at the long end and the effective image stabilization, though some note softness beyond 200mm and noticeable vignetting at full zoom. A few reviewers experienced quality control issues like blurry images or a non-functional focus ring, but the overwhelming consensus is that this lens delivers outstanding performance for its price point.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness for the price
  • Fast and silent STM autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Great value for money
Cons
  • Softness beyond 200mm
  • Noticeable vignetting at full zoom
  • Plastic build quality
  • Electronic manual focus requires camera power
  • Slow maximum aperture (f/5.6 at 250mm)
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Autofocus performance 30
👍 Value for money 35
🤔 Build quality 20
👍 Image stabilization 18
🤔 Sharpness at long end 25

Scores

Budget
Nikon
87
Canon
94
Street
Nikon
73
Canon
80
Portrait
Nikon
79
Canon
78
Video Cinema
Nikon
72
Canon
78
Travel
Nikon
69
Canon
74
Landscape
Nikon
68
Canon
74
Macro
Nikon
73
Canon
68
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
61
Canon
71
Professional
Nikon
64
Canon
69

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmCanon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min16 mm55 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm250 mm
Elements—15
Groups—12
Aspherical Elements3★0
ED Elements2★1
CoatingSuper Integrated CoatingSuper Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/4
Min Aperture3.5-5.64-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountNikon FCanon EF-S
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed—✗
Weight0.48 kg0.38 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-SSTM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm250 mm★
Max Magnification—0.29x★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile

Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Verdict

═ Tie

Both products are closely matched - Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm wins 2 specs while Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM wins 4.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

Macro

Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports