Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
88 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 24mm

Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 24mm

Canon
61 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 24mm

88 out of 100 high confidence 115 reviews

The Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM pancake lens is widely praised for its compact size, sharp image quality, and excellent value. Users love it as a lightweight walk-around lens for travel, street photography, and landscapes, with many noting its surprisingly good macro mode and low-light performance. A few criticisms mention vignetting at wide apertures, noisy autofocus, and lack of image stabilization, but overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Sharp image quality
  • Excellent value for money
  • Great for travel and street photography
  • Surprisingly good macro mode
Cons
  • Vignetting at wide apertures
  • Noisy autofocus in some cases
  • No image stabilization
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Slow autofocus for video
👍 Image quality 28
👍 Size and weight 22
👍 Value for money 18
👍 Low light performance 10
👍 Macro mode 6
👎 Autofocus noise 4

Scores

Budget
Nikon
87
Canon
57
Portrait
Nikon
79
Canon
38
Macro
Nikon
73
Canon
50
Street
Nikon
72
Canon
58
Video Cinema
Nikon
71
Canon
51
Travel
Nikon
68
Canon
52
Landscape
Nikon
65
Canon
47
Professional
Nikon
62
Canon
50
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
61
Canon
47

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmCanon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 24mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm24 mm
Elements—6
Groups—5
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements22
CoatingSuper Integrated CoatingSuper Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountNikon FCanon EF-S
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed—✗
Weight0.48 kg0.13 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-SSTM★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm160 mm★
Max Magnification—0.27x★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile

Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 24mm

  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports