Sigma Art 30mm F2.8 DN 35mm

Sigma Art 30mm F2.8 DN 35mm

Sigma
81 Overall Score
vs
TTArtisan APS-C FR-0934 8mm

TTArtisan APS-C FR-0934 8mm

TTArtisan
61 Overall Score

Scores

Street
Sigma
91
TTArtisan
60
Portrait
Sigma
85
TTArtisan
68
Macro
Sigma
78
TTArtisan
59
Video Cinema
Sigma
76
TTArtisan
50
Budget
Sigma
71
TTArtisan
49
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
70
TTArtisan
38
Professional
Sigma
70
TTArtisan
45
Travel
Sigma
65
TTArtisan
46
Landscape
Sigma
58
TTArtisan
40

Specifications

Sigma Art 30mm F2.8 DN 35mmTTArtisan APS-C FR-0934 8mm
Optics
Typestandardwide-angle
Focal Length Min30 mm25 mm
Focal Length Max30 mm25 mm
Elements7—
Aspherical Elements2★—
ED Elements2★—
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsSony E
Formatmicro-four-thirdsAPS-C★
Weight0.14 kg★0.17 kg
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm250 mm★
Max Magnification1:8.1★—

Pros & Cons

Sigma Art 30mm F2.8 DN 35mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

TTArtisan APS-C FR-0934 8mm

  • Strong aperture (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Art 30mm F2.8 DN 35mm

Scores 81 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 18 specs.

Sigma Art 30mm F2.8 DN 35mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports