Viltrox EPIC Maestro CIN049 35mm

Viltrox EPIC Maestro CIN049 35mm

Viltrox
33 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
86 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Viltrox
42
Panasonic
95
Budget
Viltrox
38
Panasonic
91
Landscape
Viltrox
37
Panasonic
86
Travel
Viltrox
28
Panasonic
86
Video Cinema
Viltrox
38
Panasonic
86
Street
Viltrox
32
Panasonic
80
Professional
Viltrox
35
Panasonic
80
Portrait
Viltrox
29
Panasonic
78
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
30
Panasonic
77

Specifications

Viltrox EPIC Maestro CIN049 35mmPanasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max75 mm200 mm
Elements1917
Groups1313
Aspherical Elements—1★
ED Elements—4★
CoatingCoated to Minimize Horizontal FlaresFluorine coating
Aperture
Max ApertureT22f/4
Min ApertureT24-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades89★
Build
MountARRI PLL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight1.98 kg0.41 kg★
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—Autofocus
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance787 mm140 mm★
Max Magnification—0.5x★

Pros & Cons

Viltrox EPIC Maestro CIN049 35mm

  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Below average build (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports