HOLGA HL-C 60mm
HOLGA
40 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Tamron
68 Overall Score
Scores
Travel
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Video Cinema
Portrait
Specifications
| HOLGA HL-C 60mm | Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | standard | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 60 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 60 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | — | 17 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Internal Surface coatings, multiple-layered coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/8 | f/18 |
| Min Aperture | f/8 | 3.5-6.3 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Nikon F |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weight | 0.03 kg★ | 0.40 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Auto Focus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 498 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:3.7★ |
Pros & Cons
HOLGA HL-C 60mm
- Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average bokeh (21st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Pricing
HOLGA HL-C 60mm
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
No current pricing available
Verdict
Winner: Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Scores 68 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 20 specs.
