Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon
61 Overall Score
vs
Sigma APO EX DG OS HSM Macro 106101 150mm

Sigma APO EX DG OS HSM Macro 106101 150mm

Sigma
54 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Canon
76
Sigma
33
Landscape
Canon
74
Sigma
42
Portrait
Canon
45
Sigma
71
Macro
Canon
51
Sigma
69
Budget
Canon
66
Sigma
45
Professional
Canon
65
Sigma
62
Video Cinema
Canon
57
Sigma
62
Wildlife Sports
Canon
62
Sigma
49
Street
Canon
59
Sigma
52

Specifications

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USMSigma APO EX DG OS HSM Macro 106101 150mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min17 mm150 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm150 mm
Elements12—
Groups9—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements13★
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/4f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountCanon EFSigma SA Bayonet
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.50 kg★1.18 kg
Filter Thread77 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★HSM (Hyper-Sonic Motor)
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm★381 mm
Max Magnification0.24x1:1★

Pros & Cons

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (76th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Sigma APO EX DG OS HSM Macro 106101 150mm

  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong aperture (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Scores 61 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalWildlife Sports

Sigma APO EX DG OS HSM Macro 106101 150mm Better at:

MacroPortraitVideo Cinema