Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

Sigma
75 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Sigma
71
Tamron
97
Macro
Sigma
82
Tamron
95
Landscape
Sigma
72
Tamron
87
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
65
Tamron
85
Professional
Sigma
77
Tamron
85
Street
Sigma
70
Tamron
83
Video Cinema
Sigma
75
Tamron
82
Portrait
Sigma
58
Tamron
81
Travel
Sigma
59
Tamron
81

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max16 mm300 mm
Elements1620
Groups1313
Aspherical Elements23★
ED Elements5★2
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/4
Min Aperturef/1.44-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.41 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motorVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification1:101:3.8

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (79th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Pricing

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

No current pricing available

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider