Sigma 738109 150-500mm

Sigma 738109 150-500mm

Sigma
55 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sigma 738109 150-500mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 15 reviews

The Sigma 50-500mm OS HSM lens is widely praised for its incredible versatility, sharp image quality, and excellent optical stabilization, offering a massive zoom range that covers everything from standard to super-telephoto. Users consistently highlight its great value for money compared to expensive brand-name alternatives, though many note the significant weight and the need for a tripod or monopod for extended handheld use. Some users report autofocus hunting in low light or with small subjects, and a few mention reliability issues like the lens extending under its own weight or requiring repair, but overall satisfaction remains very high.

Pros
  • Excellent image sharpness and clarity
  • Incredible 50-500mm zoom versatility
  • Great value for money vs. brand lenses
  • Effective optical stabilization (OS)
  • Solid, professional build quality
Cons
  • Very heavy, tiring for handheld use
  • Autofocus hunts in low light
  • Lens extends under its own weight
  • Requires good light or high ISO body
  • Slow aperture at long end (f/6.3)
👍 Image quality 12
👍 Value for money 8
👎 Weight and portability 10
👍 Optical stabilization 7
🤔 Autofocus performance 6
👍 Build quality 5

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Scores

Professional
Sigma
42
Nikon
89
Budget
Sigma
56
Nikon
85
Street
Sigma
46
Nikon
84
Macro
Sigma
55
Nikon
84
Portrait
Sigma
51
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Sigma
54
Nikon
82
Landscape
Sigma
45
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
49
Nikon
73
Travel
Sigma
40
Nikon
70

Specifications

Sigma 738109 150-500mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min150 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max500 mm28 mm
Elements—13
Groups—11
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements33
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/5f/2.8
Min Aperture4.5-6.3f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountPentax KAF3Nikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight1.97 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread95 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHSMStepping Motor★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Sigma 738109 150-500mm

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
  • Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports