Leica Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 11177 16-35mm
Leica
59 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S 200mm
Nikon
66 Overall Score
Scores
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Professional
Budget
Street
Video Cinema
Macro
Travel
Specifications
| Leica Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 11177 16-35mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S 200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 70 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 18 | 22 |
| Groups | 12 | 18 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 2 |
| ED Elements | 3 | 6★ |
| Coating | Multi-layer coatings, AquaDura coating | Anti-reflective coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-4.5 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.99 kg★ | 1.43 kg |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | stepping motor★ | Silent Wave Motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | 1.10 m |
| Max Magnification | 0.27x★ | 0.21x |
Pros & Cons
Leica Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 11177 16-35mm
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile
Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S 200mm
- Strong optical (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (79th percentile)
- Below average build (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
- Below average macro (31st percentile)
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S 200mm
Scores 66 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.