AYVVPII Silent UHF9-3

AYVVPII Silent UHF9-3

AYVVPII
16 Overall Score
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic
82 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
AYVVPII
26
Beyerdynamic
84
Commute
AYVVPII
11
Beyerdynamic
84
Music
AYVVPII
19
Beyerdynamic
81
Gaming
AYVVPII
18
Beyerdynamic
81
Work
AYVVPII
14
Beyerdynamic
78
Studio
AYVVPII
18
Beyerdynamic
77
Calls
AYVVPII
8
Beyerdynamic
68

Specifications

AYVVPII Silent UHF9-3Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Design
Form Factorover-earon-ear
Open/Closedclosed
Foldable
Weight0.17 kg0.22 kg
Ear Cushionreplaceable ear pads
Headbandaluminum and durable textiles
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size45 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max22 kHz
Impedance32 Ω48 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeAdaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
ProfilesAVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Range15 m
Battery
Battery Life9 hrs40 hrs
Charge Time3 hrs1.5 hrs
Fast Charging15 Minutes for 15 Hours
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Capacity630 mAh
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count2
NC Mic
Boom Mic
Detachable Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Fast Pair
Touch Controls
Appbeyerdynamic app
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode

Pros & Cons

AYVVPII Silent UHF9-3

  • Strong comfort (68th percentile)
  • Below average battery (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average mic (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average sound (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

  • Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile

Verdict

Winner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 39 specs.

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 Better at:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute